The news today about Scott McClellan's new book describing his experiences and 25th hour-misgivings as White House press secretary is interesting to me for a few reasons.First, I was, and sometimes still am, a press secretary.
Second, not that his is a name to be proudly dropping today, but McClellan was the first person I met from the national Bush-Cheney operation when I was working as the press staffer for the 2000 Michigan effort. As traveling press secretary for that campaign, he was often the person telling me what to do when Governor Bush made stops in Michigan.
And third, the whole story strikes me as very ironic -- even hypocritical. Here's why.
There are certainly many criticisms levied against the Bush Administration each day. Some are completely justified, others aren't, and I'm not about to pick a battle between them all. Still, I think that when the book closes on this presidency, a fair assessment will be that more often than not, Bush believed in the right things, but got this part wrong: he and his administration were unable to manage the government with effectiveness, and in many cases displayed simple incompetence.
One reason for this is that President Bush, as often reported, is very loyal to the people who have been with him a long time. In many cases it appears that a person's loyalty scored them more points than their competence. Harriot Meyers' aborted appointment to the Supreme Court comes to mind. Mike Brown and his tenure at FEMA. Rumsfeld.
And, there is probably no more photogenic poster child for a loyalty hire than Scott McClellan. McClellan was with Bush in Texas. He was with him on the plane as they flew from campaign stop to campaign stop across the country in 2000. He was with him when the Texas crew came to Washington. So, when his predecessor left the press secretary post, McClellan's time had come -- even though it was painfully clear to anyone who ever watched him brief the press that he was not the best person for that very important job.
Let me say, the job of White House press secretary is terrifyingly difficult. I can hardly imagine the stress and constant pressure. Still, as someone on the Corner wrote today, when standing at the press room podium, McClellan projected all the calm and self-confidence of a substitute teacher facing a room full of 13-year olds. He stood there for 3 years, and it never got much better.
So today, the man who once owed his job and his ability to write a tell-all book to loyalty, is being utterly disloyal. The only consistency in the scenario is his competence.
UPDATE: The Washington Post account from Thursday, hits on similar ideas.







